Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Fwd: Re: AIM 3.0
From: pram512 () YAHOO COM (Me Uh, K.)
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 15:36:17 -0800
Sorry for the extra set of > - I mailed it to the wrong person, had to forward the copy in my outbox. -mia k. (I'm not really a total f***-up, I just play one in real life) --- "Me Uh, K." <pram512 () yahoo com> wrote:
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 14:55:28 -0800 (PST) From: "Me Uh, K." <pram512 () yahoo com> Reply-to: pram512 () yahoo com Subject: Re: AIM 3.0 To: Blue Boar <BlueBoar () THIEVCO COM> --- Blue Boar <BlueBoar () THIEVCO COM> wrote:As for overflows... there was the twsited rumor situation about AIM overflows, apparantly spread by an MS employee?? Anyone ever get verfication on that one?wasn't there something about reverse overflows, a few months back, when MS was trying to link their messenger to AIM, and AOL kept changing thier protocols to stay ahead of them. I thought I read something about AOL using buffer overflows to crash the MS Client, while AIM was unnaffected, so AOL used it in every exchange, in order to prevent MS from using their customers. Sound familiar? Am I wrong? (it's been a while, I wasn't really interested, so I only read it once, no further research) -mia k. (finally catching up on email backlog, and replying to old messages :) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
Current thread:
- Fwd: Re: AIM 3.0 Me Uh, K. (Nov 02)