tcpdump mailing list archives

Re: reconstruct HTTP requests in custom sniffer


From: Andrej van der Zee <andrejvanderzee () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:09:53 +0900

Hi Cedric,


Support for TCP segmentation as well as new parsers that use this
feature should be pushed before end of week. Concerning the capture of
POST messages we should probably start working on this in february (this
is a small company so no schedule is ever definitive, so no promise).


I guess we just have to wait awhile then and see how things develop. We are
a small company too, and the projects concerning POST re-assembly need some
time to take off. After TCP segmentation is pushed, I will make some time to
get a first feel of junkie.



In some of our projects, we are only interested in the length of HTTP
requests and responses therefor reassembling the whole requests would be
overkill, as the segment lengths can be read from the TCP headers of
packets
in a TCP stream, obviously.

Yes, in theory we could follow the sizes associated with each request quite
precisely even with truncated packets as long as the "Content-length"
header lines are present.


Another way is too follow the TCP stream and summarize the payload lengths
in the TCP headers instead of using HTTP headers, ignoring retransmitted
packets.


To be honest, truncated packets were
introduced very recently and were not tested much (since we do not
require this feature), thus I'm not certain junkie is very robust in this
regard ; but I'm going to check.


Nice test-case for us would be to check if one could get the HTTP
request/response lengths as described above.

Cheers,
Andrej
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.


Current thread: