Re: DLT for Radiotap+WiMAX?

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

Charles Clancy wrote:

> 1. Allocate another DLT specifically for Radiotap+WiMAX
>
> 2. Extend the Radiotap header to indicate what protocol it's encapsulating
>
> 3. Don't use Radiotap, and develop something else
>
> What's the group's thoughts on these options, and which would be most
> preferred?  #1 seems easiest, and #2 seems most logical.

I prefer #1 - it's easier, *and* it seems more logical to me; the most 
important thing about a capture would seem to me to be the link-layer 
type, not the fact that it has radio information.

-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.