tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: Packet capture performance comparison of
From: Stephen Donnelly <stephen () endace com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:41:31 +1200
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 03:09 +0000, Jefferson Ogata wrote:
Stephen Donnelly wrote:On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 22:00 +0000, Jefferson Ogata wrote:some packets to disk. Has anyone out there put together such a box and come up with some performance statistics?[snip]Endace also offers disk capture appliances which provide this level of performance. Unfortunately I'm not aware of any recent independent test publications.Hmm. I wonder if that's because your company requires signing an NDA for getting eval gear. :^/
I can't comment on that, although I think it is fairly common practice. There have been a few university papers published, as you noted. Here is another thesis "On the Quality of Computer Network Measurements": http://www.bth.se/fou/forskinfo.nsf/6753b78eb2944e0ac1256608004f0535/6f935ee3049f95d7c125709800464cac?OpenDocument Regards, Stephen. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Stephen Donnelly BCMS PhD email: sfd () endace com Endace Technology Ltd phone: +64 7 839 0540 Hamilton, New Zealand cell: +64 21 1104378 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- Packet capture performance comparison of quad-core Xeon vs Opteron Jefferson Ogata (Jun 27)
- Re: Packet capture performance comparison of Stephen Donnelly (Jun 27)
- Re: Packet capture performance comparison of Jefferson Ogata (Jun 27)
- Re: Packet capture performance comparison of Stephen Donnelly (Jun 27)
- Re: Packet capture performance comparison of Jefferson Ogata (Jun 27)
- Re: Packet capture performance comparison of Stephen Donnelly (Jun 27)