tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: why not filtering at driver level ?
From: Jefferson Ogata <Jefferson.Ogata () noaa gov>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 05:38:29 +0000
On 2006-10-24 05:15, Guy Harris wrote:
Guy Harris wrote:You forgot option 3: 3. Raise the limit on the maximum number of BPF instructions.You might also have to raise the limit on socket options; see http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/2004/05/msg00007.html
Well, this gives me the urge to quote Steven Wright: "I'm having deja vu and amnesia at the same time." :^) -- Jefferson Ogata <Jefferson.Ogata () noaa gov> NOAA Computer Incident Response Team (N-CIRT) <ncirt () noaa gov> "Never try to retrieve anything from a bear."--National Park Service - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- Re: Sniffing inbound ethernet frames only, (continued)
- Re: Sniffing inbound ethernet frames only Jefferson Ogata (Oct 21)
- Re: Sniffing inbound ethernet frames only Jost-DVSB (Oct 23)
- Re: Sniffing inbound ethernet frames only Jefferson Ogata (Oct 23)
- why not filtering at driver level ? madhuresh (Oct 23)
- Re: why not filtering at driver level ? Guy Harris (Oct 23)
- Re: why not filtering at driver level ? madhuresh (Oct 23)
- Re: why not filtering at driver level ? Guy Harris (Oct 23)
- Re: why not filtering at driver level ? madhuresh (Oct 23)
- Re: why not filtering at driver level ? Guy Harris (Oct 23)
- Re: why not filtering at driver level ? Guy Harris (Oct 23)
- Re: why not filtering at driver level ? Jefferson Ogata (Oct 23)
- Re: why not filtering at driver level ? Jefferson Ogata (Oct 23)
- Re: Sniffing inbound ethernet frames only Jost-DVSB (Oct 23)
- Re: Sniffing inbound ethernet frames only Jefferson Ogata (Oct 21)
- Re: Sniffing inbound ethernet frames only Jost-DVSB (Oct 23)
- Re: Sniffing inbound ethernet frames only Hannes Gredler (Oct 24)