tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: Multi process sniffing and dropped packets
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2 () hp com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:11:58 -0800
I would choose threads but my "boss" prefers processes; he said computation parallelizing mechanism (in his cluster) don't work well with threads as it does with processes; i don't know if is true, now i'll implement my software with processes and then with posix threads; so i'll "taste" performance differences.
_Clusters_?!? That is a rather important detail...Somehow I seriously doubt that a libpcap application can span nodes in a computational cluster. At least not the stuff doing the promiscuous mode bits.
rick jones - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- Multi process sniffing and dropped packets computational_complex-forthespam (Jan 12)
- Re: Multi process sniffing and dropped packets Gianluca Varenni (Jan 12)
- Re: Multi process sniffing and dropped packets Guy Harris (Jan 12)
- Re: Multi process sniffing and dropped packets Gianluca Varenni (Jan 13)
- Re: Multi process sniffing and dropped packets Robert Lowe (Jan 12)
- Re: Multi process sniffing and dropped packets computational_complex-forthespam (Jan 14)
- Re: Multi process sniffing and dropped packets Rick Jones (Jan 17)
- Re: Multi process sniffing and dropped packets computational_complex-forthespam (Jan 21)
- Re: Multi process sniffing and dropped packets Guy Harris (Jan 12)
- Re: Multi process sniffing and dropped packets Gianluca Varenni (Jan 12)
- Re: Multi process sniffing and dropped packets Michael Richardson (Jan 12)
- Re: Multi process sniffing and dropped packets Guy Harris (Jan 12)
- Re: Multi process sniffing and dropped packets Guy Harris (Jan 12)
- Re: Multi process sniffing and dropped packets Rick Jones (Jan 12)