tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: nanosecond timestamp
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:15:46 -0800
On Dec 9, 2004, at 2:08 PM, Darren Reed wrote:
In some email I received from Guy Harris, sie wrote:BTW, where are you getting the nanosecond-resolution time stamps in Solaris?gethrtime
That says what the high-resolution time counter's value is now, not what the value was when bufmod saw the packet (which raises another issue, namely that the time stamps you get out of libpcap might have nanosecond *precision* but they might not have nanosecond *accuracy*) - or are the packets in question not being captured by libpcap, so that you can use "gethrtime()" to time stamp packets reasonably close to the time t which they arrived?
- This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- nanosecond timestamp Dumas Hwang (Dec 09)
- Re: nanosecond timestamp Guy Harris (Dec 09)
- Re: nanosecond timestamp Guy Harris (Dec 09)
- Re: nanosecond timestamp Darren Reed (Dec 09)
- Re: nanosecond timestamp rick jones (Dec 09)
- Re: nanosecond timestamp Darren Reed (Dec 09)
- Re: nanosecond timestamp rick jones (Dec 09)
- Re: nanosecond timestamp Darren Reed (Dec 09)
- Re: nanosecond timestamp Guy Harris (Dec 09)
- Re: nanosecond timestamp Darren Reed (Dec 09)
- Re: nanosecond timestamp Guy Harris (Dec 09)
- Re: nanosecond timestamp Alexander Dupuy (Dec 09)