tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: proposed new pcap format
From: Hannes Gredler <hannes () juniper net>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 14:37:41 +0200
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 09:25:43AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote: | On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Darren Reed wrote: | | > > okay, divide the 32-bit space into two 16-bit spaces. | > > vendor 0 will be reserved. | > > tcpdump.org will be vendor 1. | > > | > > vendor 0xffff will be reserved (for the NSA). | > | > Why not make both 32bit ? | > | > I say that because design requirements are different, today, than they | > were 15 years ago. | | I tend to agree with that. 16 bits seems awefully small for a vendor id | these days. i concur - also we have a printer in oui.c that takes 32-bit integers as input .... /hannes - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- Re: proposed new pcap format Hannes Gredler (Apr 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: proposed new pcap format Christian Kreibich (Apr 02)
- Re: proposed new pcap format Darren Reed (Apr 02)
- Re: proposed new pcap format Michael Richardson (Apr 02)
- Re: proposed new pcap format Michael Richardson (Apr 12)
- Re: proposed new pcap format Darren Reed (Apr 02)
- Re: proposed new pcap format Guy Harris (Apr 02)
- Re: proposed new pcap format Richard Sharpe (Apr 04)
- Re: proposed new pcap format Ryan Mooney (Apr 05)
- Re: proposed new pcap format Guy Harris (Apr 06)
- Re: proposed new pcap format Ryan Mooney (Apr 05)
- Re: Proposed new pcap format Michael Richardson (Apr 05)
- Re: Proposed new pcap format Loris Degioanni (Apr 06)
(Thread continues...)