Snort mailing list archives

Re: Unified2 Output


From: Jim Campbell <jim () w4bqp net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:24:10 -0400

Good suggestion, Marcin. My command line was a bit different than yours and it did produce a "unified2.log". Earlier output files produced a "unified2.log.nnnnnnnn" and this one didn't so I will have to see if I can find why.

~$sudo /opt/snort/bin/snort -c /opt/snort/etc/snort/snort_config -R /opt/snort/etc/snort/snort3.rules -i enp0s25 -A unified2

~$sudo /opt/snort/bin/u2spewfoo ./unified2.log

(Event)
sensor id: 0 event id: 1 event second: 1500228129 event microsecond: 176958
        sig id: 12      gen id: 129     revision: 1 classification: 3
priority: 2 ip source: 192.168.0.10 ip destination: 192.168.0.41 src port: 52915 dest port: 22 ip_proto: 6 impact_flag: 0 blocked: 0
        mpls label: 0   vlan id: 0      policy id: 0    appid:

Packet
        sensor id: 0    event id: 1     event second: 1500228129
        packet second: 1500228129       packet microsecond: 176958
        linktype: 1     packet_length: 94
[    0] 00 23 AE 7F CC 12 20 1A 06 D6 4A 3A 08 00 45 00  .#.... ...J:..E.
[   16] 00 50 07 EA 40 00 80 06 71 3A C0 A8 00 0A C0 A8 .P..@...q:......
[   32] 00 29 CE B3 00 16 BE FB A0 F8 04 A3 96 60 80 18 .)...........`..
[   48] CF E6 C8 30 00 00 01 01 08 0A 0A 33 57 AE 02 38 ...0.......3W..8
[   64] 61 4D 00 00 00 10 04 EB EB 37 7B F9 84 73 85 6C aM.......7{..s.l
[   80] 73 08 B1 A0 F9 1A 1F 1E 24 A6 06 67 EF D9 s.......$..g..


Jim

On 7/16/2017 12:31 AM, Marcin Dulak wrote:


On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Jim Campbell <jim () w4bqp net <mailto:jim () w4bqp net>> wrote:

    Al,

    Thanks for the reply. I ran a Snort 2.9.9.0 installation for six
    to eight months in the IPS mode. In the last month or so it became
    increasingly flaky as in stopping alerting for hours at a time
    while still passing traffic. I decided to step up to Snort 3 so I
    am having to learn how it works.

    In retrospect I should have realized what you pointed out. I still
    have a lot to learn.


when providing feedback please state the command that worked for you.
People will be reading this thread in the future and will have to go through all the posts to build a context and make a guess what a solution was.
Maybe the one below? Otherwise please correct.

export LUA_PATH=/usr/include/snort/lua/?.lua
export SNORT_LUA_PATH=/etc/snort
sudo /usr/sbin/snort -l /var/log/snort -c /etc/snort/snort.lua -A unified2 -v --plugin-path /usr/lib64/snort_extra -R /etc/snort/rules/snort.rules -r test.pcap

Marcin



    Thanks,

    Jim

    On 7/15/2017 10:25 PM, Al Lewis (allewi) wrote:

    Sorry if I am misunderstanding but are you trying to get alerts
    from this pcap?

    Based on the command you are just reading a pcap and then trying
    to write something to a file.

    Without an alert generated the unified file should be blank.

    You probably need to use a -c for a config file and using -l for
    the logging location.

    https://www.snort.org/faq/readme-unified2
    <https://www.snort.org/faq/readme-unified2>



    Albert Lewis
    ENGINEER.SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
    SOURCEfire, Inc. now part of Cisco
    Email: allewi () cisco com <mailto:allewi () cisco com>








    On 7/15/17, 8:01 PM, "Snort-users on behalf of Jim Campbell"
    <snort-users-bounces () lists snort org on behalf of jim () w4bqp net>
    <mailto:snort-users-bounces@lists.snort.orgonbehalfofjim () w4bqp net>
    wrote:

    In my day-to-day use of Snort 3 I need for it to output its
    results in
    Unified2 format. Experimenting, I came upon something that isn't
    working
    for me. It may be a configuration issue that I don't yet
    understand.

    If I run "sudo /opt/snort/bin/snort -r
    ./pcaps/ie_aurora_WinXP_successfulExploitation.pcap -L dump"
    everything
    works OK.

    If I run "sudo /opt/snort/bin/snort -r
    ./pcaps/ie_aurora_WinXP_successfulExploitation.pcap -A unified2" it
    writes a "unified2.log.nnnnn" file in the default directory but the
    length is zero.

    What am I doing wrong / leaving out?

    Thanks,

    Jim

-- "We are not human beings having a spiritual experience;
    we are spiritual beings having a human experience."
    ---Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

    _______________________________________________
    Snort-users mailing list
    Snort-users () lists snort org <mailto:Snort-users () lists snort org>
    Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
    https://lists.snort.org/mailman/listinfo/snort-users
    <https://lists.snort.org/mailman/listinfo/snort-users>

    Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the
    latest Snort news!

-- "We are not human beings having a spiritual experience;
    we are spiritual beings having a human experience."
    ---Pierre Teilhard de Chardin


    _______________________________________________
    Snort-users mailing list
    Snort-users () lists snort org <mailto:Snort-users () lists snort org>
    Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
    https://lists.snort.org/mailman/listinfo/snort-users
    <https://lists.snort.org/mailman/listinfo/snort-users>

    Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the
    latest Snort news!



_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists snort org
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.snort.org/mailman/listinfo/snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!

Current thread: