Re: Quick uricontent question

[James Lay <jlay () slave-tothe-box net>]

On 2012-09-19 14:45, lists () packetmail net wrote:
> On 09/19/12 15:32, James Lay wrote:
> > As I am reading the info on uricontent, the content is already
> > normalized...does that mean I don't have to hex anything with
> > "/counter.img?theme="?  Or does it matter.  Thanks all.
>
> So before Alex jumps in, uricontent is deprecated in favor of 
> http_uri as a
> content modifier.  That being said, yeah, it still works just like 
> threshold
> being deprecated.
>
> So you have http_uri and http_raw_uri.  The latter isn't normalised
> the former
> is.  So:
>
> %3D in http_uri is literally =
> %3D in http_raw_uri is literally %3D
>
> As I understand it http_uri is faster than http_raw_uri but I welcome
> corrections here.
>
> Check out 3.5.15 http_raw_uri and 3.5.14 http_uri
>
> Thanks,
> Nathan

Ah bugger...ok thanks Nathan....crossing out uricontent in yon Snort 
manual :)

James

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
http://www.snort.org


Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort!