Snort mailing list archives
Re: (no subject)
From: JJC <cummingsj () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:44:13 -0700
To address this, the logic behind PP does just what Jason had said... if you have rules that are looking for flowbits:isset values, it enables the respective, and required, flowbits:set values. Further, if you have specified a flowbits:set rule to be explicitly disabled in the disablesid.conf section and PP needs to automatically re-enable that due to it being a dependency of other rules, it will do so.. and Shawn, to address your concern.. that was a feature request that has been added to the current version that can be found in the svn repo. I anticipate having a release out soon, it contains numerous bug-fixes and feature enhancements.. I'm just waiting on some code commits to complete. Consider this logic re: flowbit auto re-enabling: I have 3 critical rules that look for current 0-day type traffic.. they all contain flowbits:isset,this.foo; and you disabled the rule that contains flowbits:set,this.foo; because it was generating an event like "POLICY this schmuck downloaded tha foo!" and you did not want to see that. By disabling, and subsequently not re-enabling the rule containing flowbits:set,this.foo; you would be silently disabling the other 3 critical rules that relied on that flowbit, make sense? JJC On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Jefferson, Shawn <Shawn.Jefferson () bcferries com> wrote:
I don't believe that it does, and if you have rules enabled that rely on a flowbit being set, then you probably want that rule that sets the flowbit enabled, IMO. A weakness, I think of pulledpork, is that it didn't tell the user what rules it was re-enabling in the past, maybe it does now? -----Original Message----- From: Jason Wallace [mailto:jason.r.wallace () gmail com] Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 5:07 AM To: wkitty42 () windstream net Cc: snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: Re: [Snort-users] (no subject) I'm not positive but I believe it enables only the ones that are actually needed based on what is actually needed. Meaning if a rule is enabled that uses flowbits:isset,http.quicktime; and the rule(s) that contain flowbits:set,http.quicktime; are disabled then it will enable that/those rules. I do not think it enables every flowbits:set rule. On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:42 PM, waldo kitty <wkitty42 () windstream net> wrote:2. how can/does PP handle the possibility of enabling only one or two of the flowbits setting rules if not all of them are desired to be enabled?------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- (no subject) sasa susmanto (Mar 01)
- Re: (no subject) Joel Esler (Mar 01)
- Re: (no subject) Alan Ptak (Mar 02)
- Re: (no subject) waldo kitty (Mar 02)
- Re: (no subject) Jason Wallace (Mar 03)
- Re: (no subject) Jefferson, Shawn (Mar 03)
- Re: (no subject) JJC (Mar 03)
- Re: (no subject) Jefferson, Shawn (Mar 03)
- Re: (no subject) Dave Venman (Mar 03)
- Re: (no subject) Joel Esler (Mar 04)
- Re: (no subject) Alan Ptak (Mar 02)
- Re: (no subject) Joel Esler (Mar 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- (no subject) sasa susmanto (Mar 02)
- Re: (no subject) Alan Ptak (Mar 02)