Re: Snort 2.8.6 performance

[waldo kitty <wkitty42 () windstream net>]

On 10/8/2010 13:19, Jefferson, Shawn wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed performance (dropped packets), really take a dive today?
>   I’m missing about 20-30% of packets now… on a sensor that was running great at
> about 100-200 mb/s until just today/last night. According to my snort stats
> there isn’t anything unusual as far as stream or frag events go, but the snort
> process is using 100% CPU today. I’m using the VRT paid subscription rules.

please quote back your "snort -V" output... your config may also be needed... 
possible you found a bug or some way that someone is trying to evade IDS several 
other factors...




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users