Snort mailing list archives
Daemonlogger and BPF
From: "Randal T. RIoux" <randy () procyonlabs com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:15:07 -0400
I have a question about the file format for bpf filtering with Daemonlogger. The syntax isn't described anywhere. However, this is what I know. "port 80 and port 8080" works fine for the -f command line inclusion. "port 80 and port 8080 and port 8181" throws this error: expression rejects all packets So, I guess my question really is: what is the proper formatting/syntax for BPF usage in Daemonlogger? Thanks! Randy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Daemonlogger and BPF Randal T. RIoux (Jun 06)
- Re: Daemonlogger and BPF Jason Brvenik (Jun 06)
- Re: Daemonlogger and BPF Martin Roesch (Jun 06)
- Re: Daemonlogger and BPF Randal T. RIoux (Jun 06)