Snort mailing list archives
Re: Upgrade to 2.6.x
From: "Michael Scheidell" <scheidell () secnap net>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:23:44 -0400
-----Original Message----- From: snort-users-bounces () lists sourceforge net [mailto:snort-users-bounces () lists sourceforge net] On Behalf Of Cody Holland Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 2:39 PM To: snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: [Snort-users] Upgrade to 2.6.x We have multiple sensors throughout our network, all using barnyard to dump alerts into a single snort database. Currently all of our sensors are running snort 2.4.x. If I want to upgrade one of these sensors to 2.6.x will there be any issues using the same database as the other 2.4.x's?
I assume you are thinking about the sig generator id added to 2.6 schema? There is an (unofficial) patch floating around for barnyard that will support the 2.6 schema with the sig generator id, and claims also to fix a loading issues as well. Do some google a couple months back. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Upgrade to 2.6.x Cody Holland (Oct 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Upgrade to 2.6.x Paul Melson (Oct 24)
- Re: Upgrade to 2.6.x Michael Scheidell (Oct 24)