Snort mailing list archives
Re: [Fwd: snort-2.6rc1 using a lot of memory]
From: "Nerijus Krukauskas" <nkrukauskas () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:56:11 +0300
On 19/04/06, Steven Sturges <steve.sturges () sourcefire com> wrote:
Nerijus-- As noted in the RELEASE.NOTES, there was a change in the default pattern matching engine from Wu-Manber to standard Aho-Corasick which is faster but consumes more memory.
Right, found that.
The Aho-Corasick implementation in snort has a few different memory models, standard, full, banded, sparse, and sparse banded. The sparse and spare-banded ones consume much less memory... To use them, add a snort.conf line, as desired, for example. Wu-Manber is being deprecated in the next release. config detection: search-method ac-sparsebands
Found some explanations and possible values for search-method in src/fpcreate.c. Would be nice to have that in snort_manual. Anyway, thanks for clarifications and my test snort-2.6rc1 is now 204Mb of resident size with ac-sparsebands. -- http://nk99.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: [Fwd: snort-2.6rc1 using a lot of memory] Steven Sturges (May 10)
- Re: [Fwd: snort-2.6rc1 using a lot of memory] Nerijus Krukauskas (Apr 20)