Snort mailing list archives
FC4 and RHEL4 binaries?
From: "Eric Wood" <eric () interplas com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:50:29 -0400
Are there any reasons that a RedHat Enterprise kernel is *less capable* to detect intrusion attempt than a fedora kernel?
My logic for thinking this is perhaps redhat deliberately turns features off of the enterprise kernel that just doesn't make sense in a production running server. Even CentOS for that matter.
I'm new on the list, but is there a FC4 binary in the works? thanks,-eric wood
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- FC4 and RHEL4 binaries? Eric Wood (Aug 29)
- RE: FC4 and RHEL4 binaries? Patrick Harper (Aug 29)