Snort mailing list archives
2.4.0 RPM - inline conflics w/ snort
From: "Earl Sammons" <esammons () hush com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:13:46 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is there a specific reason why not to allow anyone to run both "snort" and "snort-inline" ? Refering to: %{?_with_inline:%define conflicts snort } Reason I ask is that we run snort on the Honeywall in all three modes and need to be able to start/stop/stat them independently. We currently use a single "inline aware" binary for everything but it might make things cleaner to use seperate binaries at least for inline vs non-inline stuff. We may be the only ones out here running like this... maybe not. Earl -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Version: Hush 2.4 wkYEARECAAYFAkLqK3kACgkQk7+e+4lPSm3oyQCgkRCWTOB9WsZ/+EuAwXicjkvFVKsA n3FcmolcDZ/HdA99icHvkiTVD2ts =n5Io -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- 2.4.0 RPM - inline conflics w/ snort Earl Sammons (Jul 29)