Snort mailing list archives
False positive rate in sfportscan
From: Bjarte Malmedal <bjarte () malmedal net>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 19:20:23 +0200
HiI have been experimenting with sfportscan and notice that sensitivity level Medium produces more false positives than sensitivity level High. If I have understood how sfportscan works, this should be the other way around.
Can anyone offer an explanation on why these results are observed? Thanks, Bjarte ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- False positive rate in sfportscan Bjarte Malmedal (Jun 15)