Snort mailing list archives
Re: confuse with alerts file
From: maku bex <maku_bexs () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
thx for replying... the scenario is i have a one box installed with snort.. and i'm trying to deploy the snort into another box as well, the configuration is same [snort.conf] [Unix flavours should use this format...] output alert_syslog: LOG_AUTH LOG_ALERT output database: log, mysql, for both snort i run with this command snort -qbID -i eth0 -c /etc/snort/snort.conf -u snort -g snort m 007 for box one....its generates the alert file.... tail -f /var/log/snort/alert Sep 29 09:53:00 src@marc-sguard snort: [1:2000328:3] BLEEDING-EDGE Multiple Non-SMTP Server Emails [Classification: Misc activity] [Priority: 3]: <eth0> {TCP} x.x.x.x:1138 -> x.x.x.x:25 Sep 29 09:53:04 src@marc-sguard snort: [1:2000328:3] BLEEDING-EDGE Multiple Non-SMTP Server Emails [Classification: Misc activity] [Priority: 3]: <eth0> {TCP} x.x.x.x:1144 -> x.x.x.74:25 But for the second one....like i said...no alert file in /var/log/snort/, which is i dont quite understand here...i guest the snort is not running......so i tail the messages log ping www.google.com tail -f /var/log/messages it gives me the output: Sep 29 10:48:21 vmware snort: Warning: flowbits key 'tls1.server_hello.request' is checked but not ever set. Sep 29 10:48:21 vmware snort: Warning: flowbits key 'tls.client_hello.request' is checked but not ever set. Sep 29 10:48:22 vmware snort: Snort initialization completed successfully Sep 29 10:38:28 vmware snort: [1:408:5] ICMP Echo Reply [Classification: Misc activity] [Priority: 3]: <eth0> {ICMP} 216.239.39.99 -> 192.168.0.35 any ideas..? --- Bamm Visscher <bamm.visscher () gmail com> wrote:
Yes, he is LOGing to binary (I see the -b option), but he is ALERTing to something else. If you do NOT define an alert output in your snort.conf or on the cmd line, but use -b on the command line, you will ALERT to /var/log/snort/alert and LOG to snort.log.########. LOG and ALERT are two seperate facilities. One switch CANNOT affect them both. In my previous response, my guess was that he is using "output database: alert, blah" in his snort.conf on the second machine and "output database: log" on the original. I just reread his post though, and I think he is saying he sees alert data in /var/log/messages (it's a hard post to follow), so he must of turned on the ALERT_SYSLOG function in his snort.conf on the second machine or is using switches not included in his original post. Maku, Can you send the exact cmd line switches and output of `grep '^output' snort.conf` to the list? Bammkkkk On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:15:45 -0400, Esler, Joel - Contractor <joel.esler () rcert-s army mil> wrote:In the default setup, if you log to binary it/will not/ generate theascii mode, however, maku says that the log filesbeing produced aresnort.log.###.. This is indicative of binarylogging mode.J -----Original Message----- From: Bamm Visscher[mailto:bamm.visscher () gmail com]Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 3:07 PM To: Esler, Joel - Contractor Cc: maku bex; snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: Re: [Snort-users] confuse with alertsfileComments inline. On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:06:54 -0400, Esler, Joel -Contractor<joel.esler () rcert-s army mil> wrote:Because you are using the -b option (binarylogging) it is logginginto pcap format. Remove the -b to generate analert file. However,-b is much more useful if you are familiar withTcpdump or ethereal.JoelNo, that is not correct. The -b (binary logging)option has nothing todo with an alert file being generated. I am notsure why the outputfacilities are so misunderstood, but here again isan explanation.Snort has two output facilities: alert and log.The default plugin forthe alert facility is ALERT_FULL and the defaultlog facility isLOG_ASCII. ALERT_FULL is your std alert output tothe /var/log/alertfile, while LOG_ASCII writes packet data in asciiformat to directoriesand files based on ip address/protos/ports/etc.The -b option changesthe default behavior of the log facility only (toLOG_PCAP).-----Original Message----- From: snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net [mailto:snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net]On Behalf Of maku bexSent: Monday, September 27, 2004 8:06 AM To: snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: [Snort-users] confuse with alerts file i'm just started with snort.....the sensor wasrunningfine lately..... but sometimes.....when i'm trying to play aroundwithit into another new box.....the snort itself is not generate any output into alerts filewhich islocated in /var/log/snort FYI, i usually use this configuration... [snort.conf] output database: log, mysql, and i run with this command... snort -qbID -i eth0 -c /etc/snort/snort.conf -usnort-g snort m 007 then i cd to /var/log/snort/ what i'm confused is theres no alerts file herebutexcept of snort.log.smething so i tail messages log in /var/log/ , yes thesnortcan see packets going through.... but why it not generates the alerts file like inthe1st box...? can anyone help me out....Sounds like you may have your database outputplugin set to use thealert facility (output database: alert VERSUSoutput database: log). I'ddouble check that. Bammkkkk -- sguil - The Analyst Console for NSM http://sguil.sf.net-- sguil - The Analyst Console for NSM http://sguil.sf.net
_______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- confuse with alerts file maku bex (Sep 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- confuse with alerts file maku bex (Sep 28)
- RE: confuse with alerts file Esler, Joel - Contractor (Sep 28)
- Re: confuse with alerts file Bamm Visscher (Sep 28)
- RE: confuse with alerts file Esler, Joel - Contractor (Sep 28)
- Re: confuse with alerts file Bamm Visscher (Sep 28)
- Re: confuse with alerts file maku bex (Sep 28)
- Re: confuse with alerts file Bamm Visscher (Sep 29)
- Re: confuse with alerts file Bamm Visscher (Sep 28)