Snort mailing list archives
Re: Correct version of libpcap?
From: Erek Adams <erek () snort org>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 18:04:26 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Sheahan, Paul wrote:
I'm currently running Snort 2.0.5 build 98 on RHLinux 8.0, and in a previous post when I asked about Snort dropping packets, someone mentioned that I should be sure I'm using "Phil Wood's version of libpcap". Can someone point me to the appropriate version of libpcap that I should be runnning? I've already applied as many tweaks as I could think of, and want to rule this out next.
Ok, the short answer is 'Google is your friend'. :) Long answer--If you're not running on a Linux based system, then Phil's patches aren't going to help since they aren't ported. If you are on a Linux based OS, then you can use the libpcap that he has and get a marked performance increase. He uses a ring buffer and some other black magic mojo to make libpcap dance it's fool head off. :) Cheers! ----- Erek Adams "It looks just like a Telefunken U-47. You'll love it..." -- Frank Zappa ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Correct version of libpcap? Sheahan, Paul (Feb 02)
- Re: Correct version of libpcap? Erek Adams (Feb 02)
- Re: Correct version of libpcap? Christian Ehlen (Feb 03)
- Re: *BSD performance (was:Correct version of libpcap?) Martin Olsson (Feb 04)
- Re: Re: *BSD performance (was:Correct version of libpcap?) Christian Ehlen (Feb 07)
- Re: *BSD performance (was:Correct version of libpcap?) Martin Olsson (Feb 04)