Snort mailing list archives

Re: Dual Processor Machines


From: "fiorenzi () tiscali it" <fiorenzi () tiscali it>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:56:41 +0100

Is sure that runs very smooth and reliable, but it use only one processor switching from one to other, this because snort is not multithread and perhaps isn't possible for this kind of process that need to much realtime.

A.Fiorenzi

PPowenski () oag com wrote:

there are many more factors than just running instances.

I am running snort on Linux 9.0 with dual 933 PIV and 2.5 gb of memory

RUNS very smooth and reliable.



-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Nelson [mailto:lists () venom600 org] Sent: 08 January 2004 00:15
To: Jason Alexander
Cc: 'snort-users () lists sourceforge net'
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Dual Processor Machines


Jason Alexander wrote:
I've been reading the archives and it looks like Snort is not SMP aware yet so is there a good reason to purchase dual processor machines for the sensors boxes.

If you plan on running more than one instance of snort on any of the sensor boxen, you might consider SMP.

--Ben






-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: