Snort mailing list archives
Re: bad frag bits
From: Matt Kettler <mkettler () evi-inc com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:12:02 -0500
At 04:00 PM 11/24/2003, Samuel C. Adams wrote:
Usually these udp packets are fairly large and it's possible they have to travel over a link with low MTU at some point. Is it possible to fragment packets if the don't fragment bit is set?
Yes it's possible.. it's not RFC compliant, but it is possible.
Are there routers out there that do that?
Yes.
I thought routers were supposed to send ICMP code 3 type 4 messages (Fragmentation Needed and Don't Fragment was Set) if they are forced to deal with packets out that are too large. Is that not always the case?
No it's not always the case.. there are a lot of broken IP stacks out there.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: snort inline && current rules., (continued)
- Re: snort inline && current rules. Jeff Nathan (Nov 25)
- Re: snort inline && current rules. Matt Kettler (Nov 25)
- Re: snort inline && current rules. /dev/null (Nov 25)
- Re: snort inline && current rules. Josh Berry (Nov 25)
- snort inline behavior /dev/null (Nov 25)
- Re: snort inline behavior /dev/null (Nov 26)
- Re: snort inline behavior Stephan Scholz (Nov 26)
- Re: snort inline behavior /dev/null (Nov 26)
- Re: snort inline behavior Stephan Scholz (Nov 26)
- Re: snort inline behavior Josh Berry (Nov 26)