Snort mailing list archives
Re: Snort rule question
From: Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 13:36:26 -0400
James Lay <slave_tothe_box () yahoo com> writes:
So ok....trying to catch those naughty spammers using:
-> v. <-
And it did not work. Any reason the two aren't equivalent?
Marty deemed it important that rules always read from right to left. I had patches there a long time ago that conditionally included support to rewrite the rule before parsing but since there was no error checking for that, rules always were -> unless you edited config.h After supporting people long enough, I decided about the same thing and never fought for it again. -> <> are the only 2 direction operators. -- Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com> To err is human, to moo bovine. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Snort rule question James Lay (Jun 26)
- Re: Snort rule question Erek Adams (Jun 26)
- Re: Snort rule question Matt Kettler (Jun 26)
- Re: Snort rule question Chris Green (Jun 26)
- Re: Snort rule question Brian (Jun 26)