Re: Is this a valid rule?

[Alberto Gonzalez <ag-snort () cerebro violating us>]

and IRC ports (for most servers I've seen) 6667 not 6008

Lefevre, Steven wrote:

> I have this rule in my local rule file:
>
> alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 6008:6009 (msg:"IRC Activity")
>
> (It's to detect IRC traffic ;)
>
> Why does snort always choke on it? I've looked it over 100 times and it
> seems to follow the syntax.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
> of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
> Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en
> _______________________________________________
> Snort-users mailing list
> Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
> Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
> Snort-users list archive:
> http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
>
>  

--
The secret to success is to start from scratch and keep on scratching.




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users