Snort mailing list archives
Re: uricontent vs. content
From: Chris Green <cmg () snort org>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:16:44 -0500
"larosa, vjay" <larosa_vjay () emc com> writes:
That was it! Maybe somebody from Snort.org could put a little note in the http_decode and uricontent portions of the Snort users manual as well as maybe a note in the snort.conf for the http_decode pre-processor?
Actually I was working on that last night. It will be there for the 1.9.1 release -- Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com> A good pun is its own reword. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- uricontent vs. content larosa, vjay (Oct 29)
- Re: uricontent vs. content Andreas Östling (Oct 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- FW: uricontent vs. content larosa, vjay (Oct 30)
- Re: FW: uricontent vs. content Chris Green (Oct 30)
- RE: FW: uricontent vs. content larosa, vjay (Oct 30)
- RE: uricontent vs. content larosa, vjay (Oct 31)
- RE: uricontent vs. content larosa, vjay (Oct 31)
- Re: uricontent vs. content Chris Green (Oct 31)