Snort mailing list archives

RE: Count option WAS smtp rcpt to overflow


From: "Andy McLeod" <andy.mcleod () alivero com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:02:42 +0100

Greg

Try adding sec to snort for this capability.

http://www.estpak.ee/~risto/sec/

rgds/andy


-----Original Message-----
From: snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net
[mailto:snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net]On Behalf Of Greg Wright
Sent: 12 June 2002 01:27
To: Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Subject: [Snort-users] Count option WAS smtp rcpt to overflow



I have been trying to use Snort to help us deal with a 'Joe Job' style
spam attack. (A domain we host was used as the From address for a spam
run that has meant that we are receiving all the undeliverables -- all 1
million+ and counting - over 6Gb easily)


One of the things that would be really great was if snort could deal
with a rule if it was seen 'x' number of times within a certain
timeframe. Kinda like the portscan stuff I guess.

Just an idea while I was playing with Snort a few nights ago.

Cheers,
Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: Edwin Eefting [mailto:edwin () bit nl] 
Sent: Thursday, 6 June 2002 1:32 AM
To: Hugo Ferr; snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] smtp rcpt to overflow

On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 10:44:42 -0400 Hugo Ferr <snortgrp () hotmail com>
wrote:

'SMTP RCPT TO' overflow is buffer overflow for Lotus Sevrers. I have
7444

<snip> (maybe there should be added some "count option" for such
exploits
to these rules.)



_______________________________________________________________

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=dntextlink

_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=ort-users

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>


Current thread: