Snort mailing list archives

Re: Filter SYN ACK


From: Matt Kettler <mkettler () evi-inc com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:27:09 -0500

I assume you're writing some semi-custom snort rules to do what you need.

If that is the case, use the 'flags' rule feature. Adding "flags: A+" will cause rules to match tcp packets which have the ack bit set, but any other flags (which is probably what you want).

Based on the documentation I think "flags: A!S!F+" should match any packet with the ack bit set, but no Syn-Ack or Fin-Ack packets. But I suspect "flags: A+" is probably better, this is what all the normal snort rules do.

As for only packets containing get/post, you might look at the uricontent rule option... I'm not too familiar with it, but it seems like it might do part of what you need.

At 11:04 PM 1/29/2002 -0500, Warrick FitzGerald wrote:
Hi All,

Im hoping you guys have a better idea than some very tedious ones that I
have tried.

I am trying to filter HTTP draffic, which is easy enough, but I would only
like to capture packets that contain application layer data ie. a GET or
POST etc. does anyone know an easy way / basic filter than can do this for
me ?

Thanks
Warrick


_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: