Snort mailing list archives
RE: Drop statistics and Cisco Catalyst 6500
From: Rich Adamson <radamson () routers com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 17:56:50 -0600
Right, Snort only analyzes IP packets, but it does analyze broadcasts and multicasts (especially on a LAN), too. There are at least a few experimental rules that use a destination of 255.255.255.255 (SNMP). I included the Cisco drop stat just because it was one of the few populated stats in the output. We're still left with the question of why Snort is seeing more packets than the Cisco.
In most corporate environments, the Cisco packet counts should be greater than or equal to Snort (due to the "other" protocols that are almost always present). Dropped packets can't be compared between the two devices. If Snorts packet counts are greater than the Cisco, then obviously one of the two can't count. _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Drop statistics and Cisco Catalyst 6500 Crow, Owen (Mar 27)
- Re: Drop statistics and Cisco Catalyst 6500 Rich Adamson (Mar 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Drop statistics and Cisco Catalyst 6500 Crow, Owen (Mar 27)
- RE: Drop statistics and Cisco Catalyst 6500 Rich Adamson (Mar 27)
- Re: Drop statistics and Cisco Catalyst 6500 Dr. Richard W. Tibbs (Mar 27)
- RE: Drop statistics and Cisco Catalyst 6500 Madziarczyk, Jonathan (Mar 27)
- RE: Drop statistics and Cisco Catalyst 6500 Crow, Owen (Mar 27)