Snort mailing list archives
RE: Professionalism
From: Joshua Wright <Joshua.Wright () jwu edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:03:19 -0500
I really didn't want to get involved in the Professionalism thread, but I thought I would include some interesting information I received from the Sun rescue list: Bill Bradford wrote:
Remembered these this morning. Its great what you can find in SunSolve if you're bored enough and have a login.. SunSolve Bug ID: 4102680 ------------------------ Problem: stress test gets an XError (BadDrawable) under 2.7
CDEVersion1.3_8
Workaround: Don't pound on the mouse like a wild monkey (stress test). SunSolve Bug ID: 4256482 ------------------------- Problem: Banging on keyboard during cde startup causes dtwm hang Workaround: Don't bang on the keyboard like a wild monkey SunSolve Bug ID: 4317675 ------------------------ Problem: swear words in source code comments 2600: /* The code below fucks up if the exponents aren't at least 2 bits
*/
27: ;; Not all of this code has to be '386 code, but STUPID FUCKING MASM
(5.0)
I know there's more, but thats the only ones I could remember to search
for
offhand.. Bill -- Bill Bradford mrbill () mrbill net Austin, TX _______________________________________________ rescue maillist - rescue () sunhelp org http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
-Joshua Wright, GCIH Team Leader, Networks and Systems Johnson & Wales University Joshua.Wright () jwu edu pgpkey: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD44B4A73 fingerprint: FDA5 12FC F391 3740 E0AE BDB6 8FE2 FC0A D44B 4A73 -----Original Message----- From: Joe Smith [mailto:shadowm4n () yahoo com] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:55 PM To: snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: [Snort-users] Professionalism To the administrators of SNORT, An excerpt from "classification.config" from the most recent snort rules download. config classification: kickass-porn,SCORE! Get the lotion!,1 Regardless of your feelings towards porn, this is beyond unprofessional. It is this kind of needless stupidity that makes it that much harder for real professionals and those they report to to take snort seriously. I can tell you that, while I'm not female and am not personally offended by these remarks, I am professionally offended, and I've worked in environments in which comments as "SCORE! Get the lotion!" would be responded to with immediate dismissal. Please keep in mind that not all snort administrators are recently-pubescent male twenty-something year olds, and that such unprofessional commentary in your program does not help the noble cause that is snort. It hurts it. Joe __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- snort database diagrams?, (continued)
- snort database diagrams? Edwin Eefting (Nov 14)
- Re: snort database diagrams? Roberto Suarez Soto (Nov 14)
- Re[2]: snort database diagrams? Edwin Eefting (Nov 14)
- Re: Re[2]: snort database diagrams? Guillaume (Nov 14)
- Re: Re[2]: snort database diagrams? Roberto Suarez Soto (Nov 15)
- snort database diagrams? Edwin Eefting (Nov 14)
- RE: re: Professionalism James Fowler (Nov 15)
- Re: re: Professionalism Martin Roesch (Nov 17)
- Re: re: Professionalism Mark Rowlands (Nov 18)
- Re: re: Professionalism Jeff Nathan (Nov 19)
- Message not available
- Re: re: Professionalism Jeff Nathan (Nov 20)