Snort mailing list archives
RE: Professionalism
From: "Robert D. Hughes" <rob () robhughes com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 21:12:29 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Well, I can also ask the question "how professional is a person that uses an email address like shadowm4n () yahoo com?". Second, your emails beg the question of how legitimate is your inquiry, and how much is based on a troll factor? However, given that Snort was rated third in a test of the top ten IDS systems (the other 9 were all commercial and none of this takes into account the additional features added in 1.8.x), and that costs are minimal to implement compared to a "commercial" IDS, and given that when I call one of these commercial support centers only to sit on hold for an hour, then be told an engineer will return my call which I wait on for an hour, a day or a week, with the final result being "that'll be fixed in the next version" or "that'll require an enhancement request" compared to this project where the usual response is "oh, you need to look at this section of the FAQ" or "oh, you're right, that fix has been committed to CVS" and all within the space of minutes or, at most, hours, AND, given that I can look at all the code, easily create my own signatures, etc., I'll gladly put up with the developers having a bit of fun. Mainly though, you just have to remember that OSS is a different environment from CSS. If I send something to a customer to implement, or if I do it myself, I do it with the understanding that I may have to do a bit of "editing" first, depending on the environment it'll be running in. OSS isn't right for every environment. In some, it may never gain acceptance. But for those that are more concerned with ROI and cost-benefit ratios, I see OSS gaining ground every day. Best of luck in your endeavors, and don't let the suits get you down. - -----Original Message----- From: Joe Smith [mailto:shadowm4n () yahoo com] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:39 PM To: snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Professionalism Nothing quite like stirring the hornet's nest... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBO/HhHOa2P6TrxG1EEQIy6gCfZwliMselGacegcQTMYRSGzUeTCcAn2BL j9Ly30aV32hra5/Y8zLNLt1i =ShF9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Attachment:
PGPexch.htm.asc
Description: PGPexch.htm.asc
Current thread:
- Re: Professionalism, (continued)
- Re: Professionalism Edwin Eefting (Nov 15)
- RE: Professionalism David Kurtz (Nov 13)
- RE: Professionalism Petriz, Pablo (Nov 13)
- Re: RE: Professionalism Mark Price (Nov 13)
- Re: RE: Professionalism Martin Forest (Nov 13)
- Re: RE: Professionalism Mike Poor (Nov 14)
- RE: Professionalism Sheahan, Paul (PCLN-NW) (Nov 13)
- RE: Professionalism Erek Adams (Nov 13)
- RE: Professionalism Dragos Ruiu (Nov 13)
- RE: Professionalism Erek Adams (Nov 13)
- RE: Professionalism David Kurtz (Nov 13)
- RE: Professionalism Robert D. Hughes (Nov 13)
- RE: Professionalism Abe L. Getchell (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Ralf Hildebrandt (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Roberto Suarez Soto (Nov 14)
- snort database diagrams? Edwin Eefting (Nov 14)
- Re: snort database diagrams? Roberto Suarez Soto (Nov 14)
- Re[2]: snort database diagrams? Edwin Eefting (Nov 14)
- Re: Re[2]: snort database diagrams? Guillaume (Nov 14)
- Re: Re[2]: snort database diagrams? Roberto Suarez Soto (Nov 15)