Snort mailing list archives
Re: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole?
From: Ramin Alidousti <ramin () cannon eng us uu net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:24:51 -0400
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 05:38:41PM -0500, Frank Knobbe wrote:
What if you'd bring some part of the snort functionality in the kernel.
What was I thinking, "snort functionality in the kernel" ?? Forgive my ignorance. Ramin
I'm just thinking outloud though. What other options do we have to eliminate the buffer overflow flaw?Since snort is open-source (as is pcap), that shouldn't be too hard. ;) Feel free to look through the code and check for any unchecked buffer handling... Frank
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? ks (Jul 12)
- Re: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Daniel Voyer (Jul 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Crow, Owen (Jul 12)
- Re: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Ramin Alidousti (Jul 12)
- RE: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Crow, Owen (Jul 12)
- Re: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Ramin Alidousti (Jul 12)
- RE: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Steve Hutchins (Jul 12)
- RE: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Frank Knobbe (Jul 12)
- Re: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Ramin Alidousti (Jul 12)