Secure Coding mailing list archives

Comparing Scanning Tools


From: joe at joeteff.com (Joe Teff)
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:15:41 -0500

Fortify is a company with several products. Which product are you 
referring to? I've used some of thier products (and think highly of 
them), but I have not used all of them. What I like most about thier 
approach is they are trying to address all parts of the life cycle. The 
IDE plug-in enforces secure development at the point that code is 
written/changed. The scanner/workbench supports the build and audit 
processes. Other components work at runtime. Are they perfect? Honestly, 
I've not seen anything that is ever perfect. Are they good and getting 
better? I belive so.

jt
-----Original Message-----
From: "McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)" <James.McGovern at thehartford.com>
To: <sc-l at securecoding.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 16:50:17 -0400
Subject: [SC-L] Comparing Scanning Tools

The industry analyst take on tools tends to be slightly different than
software practitioners at times. Curious if anyone has looked at
Fortify and has formed any positive / negative / neutral opinions on
this tool and others...


***********************************************************************
**
This communication, including attachments, is
for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary,
confidential and/or privileged information.  If you are not the
intended
recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution
is
strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify
the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this communication and
destroy all copies.
***********************************************************************
**


_______________________________________________
Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L)
SC-L at securecoding.org
List information, subscriptions, etc -
http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l
List charter available at -
http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php




Current thread: