Secure Coding mailing list archives
Re: Processes HAVE been discussed to counter source-control archive attacks
From: George Capehart <gwc () acm org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:15:21 +0000
On Thursday 15 January 2004 07:00 am, Werner Koch wrote: <snip>
The drawback is that it reduces the fun of hacking and ends up in really hard and disciplined work. Thus I don't believe that many projects would care about it.
Problem is, securing the process *is* really hard and disciplined work. TANSTAAFL. ;> And it *shouldn't* be the project's option . . . My ever-diminishing $0.02 USD. /g
Current thread:
- Processes HAVE been discussed to counter source-control archive attacks David A. Wheeler (Jan 09)
- Re: Processes HAVE been discussed to counter source-control archive attacks Werner Koch (Jan 15)
- Re: Processes HAVE been discussed to counter source-control archive attacks Richard Moore (Jan 15)
- Re: Processes HAVE been discussed to counter source-control archive attacks George Capehart (Jan 15)
- Re: Processes HAVE been discussed to counter source-control archive attacks Werner Koch (Jan 15)