Secure Coding mailing list archives
Re: Scripting Languages and Secure Coding
From: ljknews <ljknews () mac com>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 17:08:48 +0000
At 1:43 PM +1100 12/5/03, Louis Solomon [SteelBytes] wrote:
The C compiler and popular C library routines do not have bugsIf you think this you are deluding yourself. No body of code as large as either is bug-free.acutally that's a good point if you think of it loosely ... think of all of those unsafe string funcs that cause many of the current buffer overflows probs.
But that is a natural consequence of choosing C with it's null terminated (rather than counted) strings.
Current thread:
- Re: Scripting Languages and Secure Coding + code, (continued)
- Re: Scripting Languages and Secure Coding + code securecodingorg (Dec 04)
- Re: Scripting Languages and Secure Coding + code Jeremy Thibeaux (Dec 04)
- Re: Scripting Languages and Secure Coding + code Louis Solomon [SteelBytes] (Dec 05)
- Re: Scripting Languages and Secure Coding + code David M. Wilson (Dec 05)
- Re: Scripting Languages and Secure Coding + code Ghita Gh. Serban (Dec 05)
- Re: Scripting Languages and Secure Coding + code securecodingorg (Dec 04)
- Re: Scripting Languages and Secure Coding Bob Toxen (Dec 04)
- Re: Scripting Languages and Secure Coding der Mouse (Dec 04)
- Re: Scripting Languages and Secure Coding Louis Solomon [SteelBytes] (Dec 05)
- Re: Scripting Languages and Secure Coding ljknews (Dec 06)
- Re: Scripting Languages and Secure Coding Bob Toxen (Dec 05)