Politech mailing list archives

FC: Americans nervous about Fed surveillance, want it anwyay


From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 01:24:51 -0500


---

From: "Robert Vinet, The Privacy Manager" <Robert () ThePrivacyManager com>
To: <declan () well com>
Subject: American Public Continues to Endorse a Broad Range of Proposals for Stronger Surveillance Powers
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:27:51 -0400

Declan,

Thought you and your readers might be interested in this press release from
Harris Interactive.

Robert

--------------------------------------------------
Robert Vinet
Publisher, The Privacy Manager
http://www.ThePrivacyManager.com

FREE Privacy News at
http://www.ThePrivacyManager.com/privacynews.htm
--------------------------------------------------

Homeland Security: American Public Continues to Endorse a Broad Range of
Proposals for Stronger Surveillance Powers, but Support Is Somewhat
Declined, According to Harris Interactive Survey

    ROCHESTER, N.Y., March 10 /PRNewswire/ -- Large majorities of the
public,
aware that it would affect their civil liberties, continue to favor giving
law
enforcement agencies stronger powers, which they might use when dealing with
people suspected of terrorist activities.  However, these majorities have
declined modestly since we last asked questions in March last year, and have
declined further since September 2001 (right after September 11).
    In spite of the (relatively small) declines in public support, the
survey
results show that there is still a broad consensus in favor of giving law
enforcement tougher powers.  It seems likely that the modest erosion is a
result of time passing, lessening the immediate horror felt on 9/11. There
is
no suggestion in these data of any negative reactions to the expanded
surveillance power which the FBI and other agencies have already been given.
    These are some of the results of The Harris Poll(R), a nationwide study
conducted by Harris Interactive of 1,010 adults surveyed by telephone
between
February 12 and 16, 2003.  Respondents rated each of ten different types of
surveillance as follows:

     * Stronger document and physical security checks for travelers:
       supported by 84%, compared to 89% last year and 93% in September
2001.
     * Stronger document and physical security checks for access to
government
       and private offices:  supported by 82%, down from 89% last year and
92%
       in 2001.
     * Expanded under-cover activities to penetrate groups under suspicion:
       favored by 81%, compared to 88% last year and 93% in 2001.
     * Use of facial recognition technology to scan for suspected terrorists
       at various locations and public events:  favored by 77%, compared to
       81% last year and 86% in 2001.
     * Issuance of a secure I.D. technique for persons to access government
       and business computer systems, to avoid disruption:  favored by 75%,
       down slightly from 78% in 2002 and 84% in 2001.
     * Closer monitoring of banking and credit card transactions to trace
       funding sources:  favored by 67%, down from 72% last year and 81% in
       2001.

    Four other proposals never enjoyed as much support as those already
mentioned (after 9/11 they were favored by between 54% and 68%).  The first
two, however, appear to be almost as important to people now (as war seems
imminent) as they were immediately following the crisis on September 11,
2001.
These are:

     * Adoption of a national I.D. system for all U.S. citizens:  favored by
       64% now, interestingly up from last year (59%) bringing it very close
       to the level that it was after September 11, 2001 (68%).
     * Expanded camera surveillance on streets and in public places: now
       favored by 61%, by 58% last year, and favored by 63% in 2001, nearly
       the same as this year.

    The next two are no less popular than they were a year ago, but they
receive less support now than they did immediately after attacks on the
World
Trade Center and the Pentagon:

     * Law enforcement monitoring of Internet discussions in chat rooms and
       other forums: now favored by 54%, 55% last year, down from 63% in
2001.
     * Expanded government monitoring of cell phones and email, to intercept
       communications: virtually unchanged since last year, favored by only
       44% and opposed by 53%.  In September 2001, it was favored by a 54%
to
       41% majority.

    Another indication that strong law enforcement in pursuit of potential
terrorists continues to enjoy strong support is that three out of every four
adults (74%) continue to feel at least somewhat confident that "U.S. law
enforcement will use its expanded surveillance powers in ... a proper way."
Only 23% (who are not very or not at all confident) seem to be concerned
about
potential abuses of these surveillance powers.
    These questions were developed with Dr. Alan Westin, the well-known
expert
on privacy issues.  In reviewing these numbers, Dr. Westin said, "The
finding
that one-quarter (23%) of the public does not believe government will use
its
new powers properly parallels Harris Interactive surveys showing that about
one quarter of U.S. adults believe they personally have been the victim of a
privacy invasion. They also indicate that a similar one-quarter adopts a
very
high, or "Privacy Fundamentalist," orientation on consumer privacy issues.
This shows that the 75% to 25% split on new government anti-terrorist powers
is not unique to the 9/11 situation but is directly in line with overall
American privacy attitudes today."

                                   TABLE 1
       FAVOR/OPPOSE TEN PROPOSALS FOR INCREASED LAW ENFORCEMENT POWERS

"Here are some increased powers of investigation that law enforcement
agencies
  might use when dealing with people suspected of terrorist activity, which
  would also affect our civil liberties.  For each, please say if you would
                             favor or oppose it."

     Base:  All Adults
                                                  %    Favor   Oppose   Not

sure/

Decline
                                                                         to

Answer
    Stronger document and physical
     security checks for travelers     Feb. 2003  %      84      14       1
                                       Mar. 2002  %      89       9       2
                                       Sept. 2001 %      93       6       1
    Stronger document and physical
     security checks for access to
     government and private office
     buildings                         Feb. 2003  %      82      15       2
                                       Mar. 2002  %      89      10       1
                                       Sept. 2001 %      92       7       1
    Expanded under-cover activities to
     penetrate groups under suspicion  Feb. 2003  %      81      17       2
                                       Mar. 2002  %      88      10       2
                                       Sept. 2001 %      93       5       1
    Use of facial-recognition
     technology to scan for suspected
     terrorists at various locations
     and public events                 Feb. 2003  %      77      20       3
                                       Mar. 2002  %      81      17       2
                                       Sept. 2001 %      86      11       2
    Issuance of a secure I.D.
     technique for persons to access
     government and business computer
     systems, to avoid disruptions     Feb. 2003  %      75      21       4
                                       Mar. 2002  %      78      16       6
                                       Sept. 2001 %      84      11       4
    Closer monitoring of banking and
     credit card transactions, to
     trace funding sources             Feb. 2003  %      67      30       2
                                       Mar. 2002  %      72      25       2
                                       Sept. 2001 %      81      17       2
    Adoption of a national I.D. system
     for all U.S. citizens             Feb. 2003  %      64      31       5
                                       Mar. 2002  %      59      37       5
                                       Sept. 2001 %      68      28       4
    Expanded camera surveillance on
     streets and in public places      Feb. 2003  %      61      37       1
                                       Mar. 2002  %      58      40       2
                                       Sept. 2001 %      63      35       2
    Law enforcement monitoring of
     Internet discussions in chat
     rooms and other forums            Feb. 2003  %      54      42       4
                                       Mar. 2002  %      55      41       4
                                       Sept. 2001 %      63      32       5
    Expanded government monitoring of
     cell phones and email, to
     intercept communications          Feb. 2003  %      44      53       4
                                       Mar. 2002  %      44      51       4
                                       Sept. 2001 %      54      41       4


                                   TABLE 2
              CONFIDENCE THAT SURVEILLANCE POWERS IN PROPER WAY
  "Overall, how confident do you feel that U.S. law enforcement will use its
expanded surveillance powers in what you would see as a proper way, under
the
 circumstances of terrorist threats?  Would you say very confident, somewhat
            confident, not very confident, not confident at all?"

    Base:  All Adults
                                          Sept.  March  February
                                          2001    2002    2003
                                            %       %       %

                Very confident             34      12      22
                Somewhat confident         53      61      52
                Not very confident          8      17      14
                Not confident at all        4       6       9
                Not sure/Decline to answer  1       3       2

    Methodology
    The Harris Poll(R) was conducted by telephone within the United States
between February 12 and 16, 2003 among a nationwide cross section of 1,010
adults (ages 18+).  Figures for age, sex, race, education, number of adults
and number of voice/telephone lines in the household were weighted where
necessary to align them with their actual proportions in the population.
    In theory, with a probability sample of this size, one can say with 95
percent certainty that the results have a statistical precision of plus or
minus 3 percentage points of what they would be if the entire adult
population
had been polled with complete accuracy. Unfortunately, there are several
other
possible sources of error in all polls or surveys that are probably more
serious than theoretical calculations of sampling error. They include
refusals
to be interviewed (non-response), question wording and question order,
interviewer bias, weighting by demographic control data and screening (e.g.,
for likely voters).  It is impossible to quantify the errors that may result
from these factors.
    These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National
Council on Public Polls.

    About Harris Interactive(R)
    Harris Interactive (http://www.harrisinteractive.com ) is a worldwide
market research and consulting firm best known for The Harris Poll(R), and
for
pioneering the Internet method to conduct scientifically accurate market
research. Headquartered in Rochester, New York, U.S.A., Harris Interactive
combines proprietary methodologies and technology with expertise in
predictive, custom and strategic research. The Company conducts
international
research through wholly owned subsidiaries -- London-based HI Europe
(http://www.hieurope.com ) and Tokyo-based Harris Interactive Japan -- as
well
as through the Harris Interactive Global Network of local market- and
opinion-research firms, and various U.S. offices. EOE M/F/D/V
    To become a member of the Harris Poll OnlineSM and be invited to
participate in future online surveys, visit http://www.harrispollonline.com


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: