Politech mailing list archives
FC: Appeals courts rule on violent arcade games (YES), anonymity (NO)
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:49:27 -0400
http://www.cluebot.com/article.pl?sid=00/10/19/2151245&mode=nested Arcade Games Shouldn't Be Censored, Court Says posted by cicero on Thursday October 19, @04:47PM from the we-always-knew-pacman-was-a-spawn-of-satan dept. The city of Indianapolis went too far in preventing teens from playing violent arcade games, a federal appeals court said. U.S. District Judge David Hamilton ruled last week that the city's law, which promises a $200 fine for each day a business does not cordon off such video games, was perfectly A-OK. But a 7th Circuit Court of Appeals panel -- including onetime Microsoft mediator Richard Posner -- thought otherwise. Yesterday they cited the First Amendment when barring Indianapolis from enforcing the law until the video game industry's appeal is complete. This case is important because it appears to be the first to extend those dusty old "harmful to minor" rules (about selling Junior porn) to material that's allegedly violent. This could affect books, newspapers, and the Internet. A shocked Judge Hamilton said in his 88-page ruling (PDF) that he saw a game where "the player participated in the action as a sniper firing an electronic rifle at enemies in a game called Silent Scope" and "observed at least one character whose entire upper torso appeared to have been severed from the lower half of the figure." Says David Horowitz of the Media Coalition: "If this decision is allowed to stand, it's likely we'd see these ordinances everywhere." (Also see the case status file, and excerpts from Hamilton's opinion, below.) Excerpts from opinion: http://www.cluebot.com/article.pl?sid=00/10/19/2151245&mode=nested ********* http://www.cluebot.com/article.pl?sid=00/10/19/1952214&mode=nested Judge Backs Corporate Effort to Unmask Users posted by lizard on Thursday October 19, @02:40PM from the who-is-john-galt-er-john-doe dept. The Freedom Forum has an article describing how a Florida appeals court has required AOL and Yahoo to reveal the names of several "John Does." These users were highly critical of the CEO of Hvide Marine Inc. This decision should worry anyone who believes in free speech and capitalism. Why? Free speech, because the right to critique anyone -- even the rich and powerful -- is a fundamental one. Capitalism, because "competition by lawsuit" is bad for business, and, if people aren't free to keep companies in line by vigorous whistleblowing and public criticism, the government will have an excuse to levy more regulations in the so-called interest of fairness. See a Lizardrant below. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology You may redistribute this message freely if it remains intact. To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- FC: Appeals courts rule on violent arcade games (YES), anonymity (NO) Declan McCullagh (Oct 19)