Penetration Testing mailing list archives

Re: felons as pentesters


From: jc <antihacker.jc () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 03:52:08 -0800


On Dec 7, 2010, at 6:27 AM, J. Oquendo wrote:

This is a humorous and misguided comment, sorry - that's my opinion. I
implore you and anyone else to take a look around at 1/3rd of the
"cybercrimes" committed (I say one third because its easy pickins).
Ready? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statistics)

If we do some quick math, of the 12 cases that immediately sprout up on
Cybercrime.gov, you should be fearing normal individuals more than you
should be fearing a "convicted" felon with regards to "cybercrime." In
fact, not ONE CASE on that site mentions ANYONE as having "former record"

Yes, I was just going to mention didn't you spend some time with Uncle Fed?

http://www.justice.gov/criminal/cybercrime/OquendoSent.htm

I'm glad you came out ahead and contribute - may I also add that the Fedz make huge mistakes? They think you're doing it, throw tremendous resources at you to prove your doing something nefarious...yet when it comes time to actually
determining your nefarious deeds...well....

On another point, the reason why none have a former record is that the people with serious records rarely get another INFOSEC job..methinks
you're an exception rather than a rule.

A pleasant exception, and a loquacious one at that!

-jc


"There is not a crime, there is not a dodge, there is not a trick, there is not a swindle, there is not a vice which does not live by secrecy." – Joseph Pulitzer




------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review Board

Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT 
and CEPT certs require a full practical examination in order to become certified.

http://www.iacertification.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: