Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access
From: cwright () bdosyd com au
Date: 5 Jun 2007 02:47:34 -0000
You stated: "First, the network was "Open" and free for use for the business' Customers. So they have no security enabled to allow their customers free access to the wifi." Exactly - to their customers - this is permission for the customers and not another. You breach property rights whether or not they are secured. The issue of whether the property is secured or not is only relivant to the extend of the illegal act, not if it is illegal. Regards, Craig ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat? Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic See HOW Now with our 20/20 program! http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access, (continued)
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Kenneth Klinzman (Jun 01)
- Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Paul Melson (Jun 04)
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access cwright (Jun 02)
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Mike Messick (Jun 02)
- Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Thor (Hammer of God) (Jun 02)
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access stonewall (Jun 03)
- Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Serg B. (Jun 04)
- Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Michael Hale (Jun 04)
- Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access David M. Zendzian (Jun 04)
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access stonewall (Jun 03)
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access cwright (Jun 02)
- Re: Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access cwright (Jun 04)
- Re: Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access cwright (Jun 04)
- RE: Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Erin Carroll (Jun 04)