Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access
From: "Paul Melson" <pmelson () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:51:32 -0400
On 6/1/07, Jeffory Atkinson <jatkinson () zelvin com> wrote:
Really make you think. Using free wireless is illegal but not if there is a message saying public then it is not. Maybe I am not seeing the whole picture but I believe the burden of notification is on the owner/access point. This is the case in most states. Using the articles example of a radar detector, if you travel in to the state of Virginia you will clearly see the burden of notification in black and white on sign stating they are illegal.
Just to clarify the details of this situation, there was no ruling. There was no trial. Fortunately, there is no case law precedent being set here. A judge ordered an arrest warrant, the man was arrested, and prosecutors pleaded the man down to a misdemeanor and $400 fine plus 40hrs of community service. It's outrageous, really. He was originally charged with a crime that carried a 5 year prison term and a $10K fine for the electronic equivalent of using the restroom without buying something. You can see the original story including an interview with Sam Peterson II (the man who was arrested), the county prosecutor, and the police chief involved here: http://www.woodtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=6546307 PaulM ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat? Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic See HOW Now with our 20/20 program! http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access ebk_lists (Jun 01)
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Jeffory Atkinson (Jun 01)
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Kenneth Klinzman (Jun 01)
- Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Paul Melson (Jun 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access cwright (Jun 02)
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Mike Messick (Jun 02)
- Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Thor (Hammer of God) (Jun 02)
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access stonewall (Jun 03)
- Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Serg B. (Jun 04)
- Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Michael Hale (Jun 04)
- Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access David M. Zendzian (Jun 04)
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access stonewall (Jun 03)
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access Jeffory Atkinson (Jun 01)
- RE: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access cwright (Jun 02)
- Re: Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access cwright (Jun 04)
- Re: Re: Interesting Ruling Regarding WiFi access cwright (Jun 04)