Port Scanning Issues

["Steinar Watne" <knut.steinar.watne () gmail com>]

Have you tried nmap or amap?

I have never tried Superscan myself, but nmap and amap seems to agree
with nessus on what ports that are open.

cheers
Steinar Watne



On 25 Jun 2007 21:59:58 -0000,  crumdub12 () gmail com <crumdub12 () gmail com> wrote:
>  A Chairde,
>
>
>    Havin, some issues with scanning stacks on my system.
>
>
> 1. Using Superscan4 ,  I scan stack UDP-TCP 1-65534 , Sometimes I
>
> get no ports open , another time I get 49159 UDP Ports open, only get port report, no attempt made to open any ports 
> ... , when get open ports , I always get 49159 UDP Ports ...... , use the scanner at 250msecs , takes around 16 hours 
> to finish.
>
>
> 2. Using Languard, Nessus and Retina , get different scans from each tool, any ideas why, how do I find out real ports 
> open.. differences can be 10,000 ports
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
>
> Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
> Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
> See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!
>
> http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!

http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------