Re: Nortel Contivity 2600

[Rodrigo Blanco <rodrigo.blanco.r () gmail com>]

Hello,

I would think of DoS at first (certain versions of the Conctivity have
DoS vulnerabilities).

Although its VXworks architecture seems very robust, it does not look
right to me to have a VPN concentrator directly accessible on the
Inernet, why not place it in a DMZ (firewall protection makes sense,
and so does IDS/IPS)?

By the way, bear in mind Contivity also has a firewall module that can
run on its same platform, this could be very reccomendable if you are
to place it directly on the Internet.

Hope this helps,
Rodrigo.

On 9/1/05, Cam Fischer <camfischer () gmail com> wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> I am looking for good reasons why I should move a Nortel Contivity
> 2600 VPN device behind a firewall.
>
> Currently the device sits on the internet, and is used for VPN traffic
> from other offices, and also for VPN dial-in users.
>
> Are there any risks with this configuration? What comments can be made
> around whether or not I should be placing this behind the firewall /
> IDS....
>
> Thanks!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner:

Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your
website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms,
login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are
futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities
to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do!
Download Trial at:

http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------