Penetration Testing mailing list archives

RE: CEH training


From: "Erin Carroll" <amoeba () amoebazone com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 08:15:52 -0700

All,

I think we've explored this subject in depth and are wandering off-topic
from the list focus. I don't see anything new being added to the discussion
so further CEH training emails will be rejected.


-Erin Carroll
"Do Not Taunt Happy-Fun Ball"


-----Original Message-----
From: ctg [mailto:plumme () gmail com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 6:53 AM
To: pen-test () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: CEH training

2. Speaking to the point of the instructor -- in instructor led 
training this will make or break the course. If this guy is 
a d$ck or 
does not explain but reads the book that's a problem.  It 
is important 
to have a well respected, technical trainer that can deliver the 
course to the students and also has field time in front of 
clients and 
doing assessments so when the students take the practical 
exam/Prometric muli-choice they can say... WOW I learned something.

Is this enough, I have seen people getting to training 
courses and cheating their way thru the course. Then getting 
place somewhere where they glows because of the certification 
what they got. The problem occurs and organisation reflect 
this problem to this individual which is in trouble at this 
point, because he/she cheated and didn't want to read the 
manual and try to things on his/her own.

The big problem really is that people don't want to use their 
freetime to do things, try them out and try to find the 
solution on their own.
I face situation everyday when people come back to me, asking 
question from all kind of things. Thing is that I have to 
think for them, and people just accept the answer, whatever 
the answer is.

When the instructor tells you about the situations, person in 
hand is able to remember that piece of information for 12 
hours and then it start to drop out, unless it's really 
important thing for the people remember. Only way in 'Hacker' 
type of courses is that you do thing before, you read the 
manual, and then you ask the question when you got stuck.

After that what you can do, do you believe on the answer what 
you got from instructor and test it. OR do you take advice, 
test it and try to form a conclusion?

I'm just saying that certification courses are good to 
certain point, those give you base information and nudge you 
on correct direction. At the end, you have to be able figure 
things on your own, or it's no good.

-ctg.-


Current thread: