Penetration Testing mailing list archives

RE: IPS Comparison


From: "Todd Towles" <toddtowles () brookshires com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:54:33 -0600

I have talked to clients and they did not like the RadWare 
box.  They say the management interface is unusable and the 
box isn't stable.

I have played with the ISS and Cisco products and have been happy...  

Again-- I haven't spent much time with either of the products 
but have "heard" from several large state clients about the 
Radware box so don't take this post for much more than mere 
conversation.

I met the head engineers from RadWare at a conference and they seemed
nice...   I think all their stuff is from Israel??

Information Security Mag has a IPS Comparison in their Nov 2005 issue

Quick and Dirty Results =

Cisco Systems - Intrusion Pevention Sensor 4255 Series = B
ISS - Preventia Network Proteciton Appliance 6400 = B+
Radware - Defense Pro = C+
Sourcefire - 3D System Intrusion Sensor 3000 = B+
Top Layer Networks - Attack Mitigator IPS 5500 = A-

Of course, this is just the quick and dirty, there are pro and cons for
all. Kinda have to read the article to get all the reasons.

-Todd

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner:

Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your
website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms,
login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are
futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities
to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do!
Download Trial at:

http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: