Penetration Testing mailing list archives

Re: XPSP2 compatability

From: Steve Friedl <steve () unixwiz net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:21:40 -0700

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:25:09AM -0400, Terry Dunlap wrote:

I read a post by Fyodor
(http://seclists.org/lists/nmap-hackers/2004/Jul-Sep/0002.html) that
this may be related to the fact that MS removed the TCP raw sockets in
SP2.


Not quite: MS removed *send* from raw sockets; receive (ala sniffers)
should be ok.

Steve

-- 
Stephen J Friedl | Security Consultant |  UNIX Wizard  |   +1 714 544-6561
www.unixwiz.net  | Tustin, Calif. USA  | Microsoft MVP | steve () unixwiz net

Current thread:

XPSP2 compatability Anjin (Aug 16)
- Re: XPSP2 compatability Roman Fomichev (Aug 17)
  - RE: XPSP2 compatability Gary everekyan (Aug 20)
- Re: XPSP2 compatability Terry Dunlap (Aug 17)
  - Re: XPSP2 compatability Steve Friedl (Aug 20)
  - Re: XPSP2 compatability Jacob Uecker (Aug 20)
- Re: XPSP2 compatability Joe Smith (Aug 17)
- Re: XPSP2 compatability Ben (Aug 19)
- Re: XPSP2 compatability Chris Haun (Aug 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: XPSP2 compatability Eric McCarty (Aug 17)
  - RE: XPSP2 compatability TracingEmails (Aug 18)
- RE: XPSP2 compatability DeGennaro, Gregory (Aug 18)
- RE: XPSP2 compatability Jon Cheuvront (Aug 18)
  - RE: XPSP2 compatability Bill Burge (Aug 19)
    - RE: XPSP2 compatability Corey Watts-Jones (Aug 20)

(Thread continues...)