Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Cisco LEAP
From: johnadams <johnadams () apple com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:30:12 -0800
On Saturday, November 1, 2003, at 08:58 PM, Rob Shein wrote:
Regarding questions 1 and 2:I'm not hugely familiar with the problem that LEAP has, but looking at this challenge from a logistical standpoint, I would say that you'd be far betteroff with a database containing the dictionary than a flat file, for performance reasons.
Not that I've been following this discussion that closely, but since when do databases perform faster than
flat files on read?If he was performing searches against data, sure, the database would be faster because it could take advantage of search algorithms, but even then data stored (sorted) in a binary-tree flat file would crush the database in terms of raw performance time because it wouldn't have deal with database overhead.
-john --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Network with over 10,000 of the brightest minds in information security at the largest, most highly-anticipated industry event of the year. Don't miss RSA Conference 2004! Choose from over 200 class sessions and see demos from more than 250 industry vendors. If your job touches security, you need to be here. Learn more or register at http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/RSA_pen-test_031023 and use priority code SF4. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Cisco LEAP Rob Shein (Nov 03)
- Re: Cisco LEAP johnadams (Nov 03)
- RE: Cisco LEAP Rob Shein (Nov 04)
- Re: Cisco LEAP johnadams (Nov 04)
- RE: Cisco LEAP Rob Shein (Nov 04)
- RE: Cisco LEAP Rob Shein (Nov 04)
- Re: Cisco LEAP johnadams (Nov 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Cisco LEAP SILES,RAUL (HP-Spain,ex1) (Nov 03)
- Re: Cisco LEAP Anders Thulin (Nov 12)