Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: "bonded and insured"
From: Frank Knobbe <FKnobbe () KnobbeITS com>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 13:21:30 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
-----Original Message----- From: Bill Casti, CQA [mailto:quire () casti com] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 7:40 PM It's the Business Owners Package Policy from The Hartford Insurance Company. Annual premium is $350. The coverages for my solely-owned "S" corporation are:
Ha! The same applies to my company (S-Corp). I have the same package from Hartford (for $350/yr, although the amounts covered are only a million.... hm... have to talk to my agent about that). However, that package is the General Liability. It does not cover mishaps during pen-tests. Those things are covered under an E&O (Errors & Omissions) Insurance package. I've got a million in E&O, which costs me about $2,000/yr. In regards to Pen Testing, I'm pretty sure that general liability does not apply. But an E&O would cover you if you rebooted a server during a port scan and the client presses charges for downtime. I believe that, while this covers insurance, the being 'bonded' is still a different story. Regards, Frank -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8 Comment: PGP or S/MIME encrypted email preferred. iQA/AwUBOxFFqpytSsEygtEFEQK4PACfYjsWO9/UVuZgOh1Jw5ZtO47lw3kAnjjl Hg+ek+8Iov6WEGo8XYT09O+b =3rrI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- "bonded and insured" Malf Easance (May 23)
- Re: "bonded and insured" H D Moore (May 23)
- Re: "bonded and insured" Bill Casti, CQA (May 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "bonded and insured" Bill Casti, CQA (May 26)
- RE: "bonded and insured" Frank Knobbe (May 28)