Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks
From: "Weiss, Bill" <bill_weiss () ATT NET>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 13:28:33 -0700
Rafael Coninck Teigao(rafael () SAFECORE NET)@Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 03:10:19PM -0300:
"van der Kooij, Hugo" wrote:I wouldn't use it this way. If you need security use an IPSEC tunnel from WS to server.I thought about it... What is WS? Anyway, I was thinking to make just the wireless part encrypted so the mobile client can access anything, even if it is outside the tunnel.
WS = workstation. And, he's right, an encrypted tunnel to the server is always the correct way to go. Encrypting the link from workstation to access point would be a decent start, though.
Current thread:
- [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Frank Knobbe (Mar 07)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Mark Seiden (Mar 07)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Max Gribov (Mar 07)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Robert Stonehouse (Mar 08)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Rafael Coninck Teigao (Mar 09)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks van der Kooij, Hugo (Mar 09)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Rafael Coninck Teigao (Mar 09)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Weiss, Bill (Mar 09)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Rafael Coninck Teigao (Mar 09)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Anton Rager (Mar 09)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks mirza sahib (Mar 11)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Phil Cox (Mar 12)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Marc Mosko (Mar 12)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Ichinin (Mar 13)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Phil Cox (Mar 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Frank Knobbe (Mar 08)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Marnix Petrarca (Mar 09)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetrating Wireless Networks Clarke, Matthew J (Mar 09)