Penetration Testing mailing list archives

RE: SAM file editing


From: "Pybus, David" <DPybus () colt-telecom com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:06:29 +0100

You shouldn't even need to decrypt the hash. With an appropriately written
utility it should be possible to replay the hash to gain access. This is
because the authentication is based purely on the hash and not on the
password.

Regards,
David Pybus

-----Original Message-----
From: SMILER [mailto:smiler () pthost com]
Sent: 25 June 2001 14:57
To: pen-test () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: SAM file editing


The problem is not that Ms auth does not check the domain, the fact is that
MS allways send your current password when accessing a new resource that
needs authentication.
This is considered a "feature" because it allows u to login into many
servers without authentication IF username/password in the server is equal
to the one that u´re currently using.
This kind of  "feature" allows a attack such as :

"if u try to acess my machine, say by typing : \\my.ip.address\myshare$ ",
your machine will send the HASH of your current password by default before
querying u for a password. If your current password fails, then it will ask
for auth. In this case I could capture your HASH and decrypt your pass and
the user would not ever dream that your machine had sent the current
password to my server.

Keep Smiling

smiler () vxd org

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Long" <matthew.long () loftusitns co uk>
To: <pen-test () securityfocus com>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 9:05 AM
Subject: RE: SAM file editing


Its not quite the same as "editing the SAM"
But,
Say you find the Domain Admin password is "abcdefgh"
And you login locally on your machine and set the local admin password to
"abcdefgh" as well.
Then when you try to access the network while logged in as the local
account
you may find that you can get domain level access because the MS
authentication doesn't seem to check the domain and just passes through
the
username and password.

I know this works for ipc$ shares but has anyone got any documentation on
any other exploitations of this.

-----Original Message-----
From: Russell, Pat [mailto:pat.russell () jlspecialty com]
Sent: 22 June 2001 12:46
To:
Subject: SAM file editing


Is it possible to edit the SAM file in NT4.0 without using an external
program?  I have an incident where someone gave himself administrative
rights the domain but insists "all" he did was modify the SAM file on the
local machine.  This doesn't sound right but I am not sure.  Thanks for
any
help...

Pat Russell
Process Control & Automation Engineer
J&L Specialty Steel, Inc.
pat.russell () jlspecialty com




**********************************************************************
COLT Telecommunications
Registered in England No. 2452736
Registered Office: Bishopsgate Court, 4 Norton Folgate, London E1 6DQ
Tel. 020 7390 3900

This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual
relationship between COLT Telecommunications, its subsidiaries or 
affiliates ("COLT") and you. Internet communications are not secure
and therefore COLT does not accept legal responsibility for the
contents of this message.  Any view or opinions expressed are those of
the author. The message is intended for the addressee only and its
contents and any attached files are strictly confidential. If you have
received it in error, please telephone the number above. Thank you.


**********************************************************************


Current thread: