Re: [PEN-TEST] Hidden NT batch file/command line execution

["Ruso, Anthony" <aruso () POSITRON QC CA>]

I've been able to bypass virus scanners with the latest version of elitewrap
and other .exe wrappers!

-----Original Message-----
From: Brentlinger, Mike (ISS eServices) [mailto:mbrentli () ISS NET]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 12:49 PM
To: PEN-TEST () SECURITYFOCUS COM
Subject: Re: [PEN-TEST] Hidden NT batch file/command line execution


Ive used a nice little app called elitewrap which will possibly do what you
want (it offers an option something like "execute hidden").

However just a litte 411; if you 'wrap' something up the end result will be
detected as a virus/trojan by most .

Mike Brentlinger
ISS Chicago



-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Ahern
To: PEN-TEST () SECURITYFOCUS COM
Sent: 10/4/00 12:20 PM
Subject: Hidden NT batch file/command line execution

I am experiencing a problem that someone on this list
might be able to answer quickly. I would think the
answers might also be of interest to most any
Penetration Tester on the list who would want to
occasionally run shell code on a box without raising
awareness of NT server operators/admins on the
console.

I am currently working with a security app that runs
as an NT service, however at frequent intervals it
executes an NT batch process in a command window
(cmd.exe). The net effect is very distracting for
anyone who has to work on the server console, as it
appears like some giant black strobe, blinking in a
way that is more much annoying than blinking HTML
text.

I know from running stealth keyloggers and certain
trojans (BO/BO2K) and program wrappers that programs
can be executed without popping up any window, without
anything on the toolbar, or in the Task Manager, and
that VB offers this capablility.

Are there any cute, clean, "down and dirty", wrapper
apps (VB scripts, etc) that will execute command line
stuff, batch files, etc., without popping anything up,
or will be pretty unobtrusive to the console operator?
Or are the only solutions really hiding the execution
in VB or other lower level code that we would have to
generate uniquely for each process we need to run
currently as a batch process??? I have to think that
someone has written something to do this already, but
a quick search hasn't revealed anything as of yet.

Any ideas?
Thanks in advance for any assistance you might be able
to proffer.


-mch







__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/