Re: is NAC dead?

["Aa'ed Alqarta" <a.qarta () gmail com>]

Albert,

I have a strong experience with Symantec Network Access Control (SNAC). As a
Symantec partner, we had a large deployment for one multi-national bank in
the middle east. It's nice, and stable. But make sure that all of your
networking gear (switches) are using the latest vendor firmware. We had some
compatibility issues in 802.1x protocol because of old firmware bugs.
Windows agents are already built in the Symantec Endpoint Protection 11, so
there was no need to deploy SNAC agent.

If you need any questions, please feel free to send.

On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Albert R. Campa <abcampa () gmail com> wrote:

> Anyone still looking into NAC or actually using a NAC type solution? I am
> looking at hardware or agentless NAC, but came across this article and
> havent heard much about it.
>
>
> http://www.networkworld.com/reviews/2010/052410-network-access-control-test.html
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Albert R. Campa
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com



-- 
Best Regards,

http://extremesecurity.blogspot.com

http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalqarta

http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_3011930.html

_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com